Review




Structured Review

Pyrosequencing Inc mlh1 promoter methylation analysis
Representative images of an EC with <t>MLH1</t> deficiency, absence of MLH1 promoter <t>methylation,</t> and positive EPM2 AIP1 immunostaining. The tumor exhibited biallelic somatic alteration of MLH1 ; one pathogenic variant in MLH1 ( NM_000249.4 ): p.Glu633 Ter (c.1897G > T), classified as a stop-gained mutation, truncating the <t>MLH1</t> <t>protein,</t> as well as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) detected in chromosomal region 3p22.2-q27.1
Mlh1 Promoter Methylation Analysis, supplied by Pyrosequencing Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mlh1 promoter methylation analysis/product/Pyrosequencing Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mlh1 promoter methylation analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "EPM2 AIP1 immunohistochemistry as a surrogate of promoter methylation analysis in endometrial carcinoma"

Article Title: EPM2 AIP1 immunohistochemistry as a surrogate of promoter methylation analysis in endometrial carcinoma

Journal: Virchows Archiv

doi: 10.1007/s00428-025-04132-3

Representative images of an EC with MLH1 deficiency, absence of MLH1 promoter methylation, and positive EPM2 AIP1 immunostaining. The tumor exhibited biallelic somatic alteration of MLH1 ; one pathogenic variant in MLH1 ( NM_000249.4 ): p.Glu633 Ter (c.1897G > T), classified as a stop-gained mutation, truncating the MLH1 protein, as well as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) detected in chromosomal region 3p22.2-q27.1
Figure Legend Snippet: Representative images of an EC with MLH1 deficiency, absence of MLH1 promoter methylation, and positive EPM2 AIP1 immunostaining. The tumor exhibited biallelic somatic alteration of MLH1 ; one pathogenic variant in MLH1 ( NM_000249.4 ): p.Glu633 Ter (c.1897G > T), classified as a stop-gained mutation, truncating the MLH1 protein, as well as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) detected in chromosomal region 3p22.2-q27.1

Techniques Used: Methylation, Immunostaining, Variant Assay, Mutagenesis

Representative images of an EC with MLH1 with a methylation score close to the cut-off. The initial biopsy A showed negative EPM2 AIP1 immunostaining and a methylation score of 9.8. In the surgical specimen B , EPM2 AIP1 immunostaining was negative, but the methylation score increased to 60% after tumor microdissection
Figure Legend Snippet: Representative images of an EC with MLH1 with a methylation score close to the cut-off. The initial biopsy A showed negative EPM2 AIP1 immunostaining and a methylation score of 9.8. In the surgical specimen B , EPM2 AIP1 immunostaining was negative, but the methylation score increased to 60% after tumor microdissection

Techniques Used: Methylation, Immunostaining, Laser Capture Microdissection



Similar Products

86
Pyrosequencing Inc mlh1 promoter methylation analysis
Representative images of an EC with <t>MLH1</t> deficiency, absence of MLH1 promoter <t>methylation,</t> and positive EPM2 AIP1 immunostaining. The tumor exhibited biallelic somatic alteration of MLH1 ; one pathogenic variant in MLH1 ( NM_000249.4 ): p.Glu633 Ter (c.1897G > T), classified as a stop-gained mutation, truncating the <t>MLH1</t> <t>protein,</t> as well as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) detected in chromosomal region 3p22.2-q27.1
Mlh1 Promoter Methylation Analysis, supplied by Pyrosequencing Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/mlh1 promoter methylation analysis/product/Pyrosequencing Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mlh1 promoter methylation analysis - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Representative images of an EC with MLH1 deficiency, absence of MLH1 promoter methylation, and positive EPM2 AIP1 immunostaining. The tumor exhibited biallelic somatic alteration of MLH1 ; one pathogenic variant in MLH1 ( NM_000249.4 ): p.Glu633 Ter (c.1897G > T), classified as a stop-gained mutation, truncating the MLH1 protein, as well as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) detected in chromosomal region 3p22.2-q27.1

Journal: Virchows Archiv

Article Title: EPM2 AIP1 immunohistochemistry as a surrogate of promoter methylation analysis in endometrial carcinoma

doi: 10.1007/s00428-025-04132-3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Representative images of an EC with MLH1 deficiency, absence of MLH1 promoter methylation, and positive EPM2 AIP1 immunostaining. The tumor exhibited biallelic somatic alteration of MLH1 ; one pathogenic variant in MLH1 ( NM_000249.4 ): p.Glu633 Ter (c.1897G > T), classified as a stop-gained mutation, truncating the MLH1 protein, as well as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) detected in chromosomal region 3p22.2-q27.1

Article Snippet: In summary, results show concordance between MLH1 promoter methylation analysis by pyrosequencing and EPM2 AIP1 IHC, with 100% EPM2 AIP1 negativity in the 70 cases that exhibited MLH1 promoter methylation by pyrosequencing.

Techniques: Methylation, Immunostaining, Variant Assay, Mutagenesis

Representative images of an EC with MLH1 with a methylation score close to the cut-off. The initial biopsy A showed negative EPM2 AIP1 immunostaining and a methylation score of 9.8. In the surgical specimen B , EPM2 AIP1 immunostaining was negative, but the methylation score increased to 60% after tumor microdissection

Journal: Virchows Archiv

Article Title: EPM2 AIP1 immunohistochemistry as a surrogate of promoter methylation analysis in endometrial carcinoma

doi: 10.1007/s00428-025-04132-3

Figure Lengend Snippet: Representative images of an EC with MLH1 with a methylation score close to the cut-off. The initial biopsy A showed negative EPM2 AIP1 immunostaining and a methylation score of 9.8. In the surgical specimen B , EPM2 AIP1 immunostaining was negative, but the methylation score increased to 60% after tumor microdissection

Article Snippet: In summary, results show concordance between MLH1 promoter methylation analysis by pyrosequencing and EPM2 AIP1 IHC, with 100% EPM2 AIP1 negativity in the 70 cases that exhibited MLH1 promoter methylation by pyrosequencing.

Techniques: Methylation, Immunostaining, Laser Capture Microdissection